Thursday, July 29, 2010

Linda Malcolm offers a different kind of policing

Pamela Post

Vancouver — From Tuesday's Globe and Mail Published on Monday,
Jul. 26, 2010 11:00PM EDT
Last updated on Tuesday, Jul. 27, 2010 5:00AM EDT


It’s a Tuesday afternoon and Constable Linda Malcolm is patrolling the streets of the Downtown Eastside in street clothes. Today it’s a Beatles T-shirt and beige pants.

A police uniform, says the sex industry liaison officer for the Vancouver Police Department, is a huge barrier to building relationships with people down here. Her badge and gun are discreetly concealed. On the streets, Constable Malcolm is regularly approached by women who know her simply as Linda, who hug her before launching into a litany of woes and grievances.

One, whose face is badly disfigured, speaks urgently in the breathless staccato of the drug-addicted, telling the officer about being hauled in by police. Constable Malcolm listens carefully, offering assistance – before the woman runs off, propelled by the force of what seems like the unrelenting daily drama of life here.

"She was savagely gang-raped," the officer says afterwards. "Caught up in a dispute between two sets of drug dealers. They cut her with a knife, they disfigured her."

Constable Malcolm, 51, has become something of a legend on the streets of the Downtown Eastside – the cop more likely to bake cookies for women than bust them. She often works on her days off, takes bad-date calls in the middle of the night from the WISH Mobile Access Van that patrols the streets, buys countless lunches and dinners for sex workers out of her own pocket. She makes crafts for them, drives them to a detoxification clinic, takes them on ferries to rehab, accompanies women going to court against predators, and finds ones who have dropped out of sight.


For the rest of the article go to:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/linda-malcolm-offers-a-different-kind-of-policing/article1652671/
Read more!

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Teenage Girls Undergo 'Breast Ironing' In Cameroon

Dear Friends:

Unfortunately we bring you another report on the tragic consequences of the practice of "breast ironing" in the west Africa country of Cameroon. If you follow the link to watch the video, be forewarned that there is brief nudity and, too, that it will bring you to tears.

Abolition!

Lisa



Teenage Girls Undergo 'Breast Ironing' In Cameroon
First Posted: 07-23-10 11:56 AM Updated: 07-23-10 04:50 PM


Affecting one out of every four girls, the brutal practice of "breast ironing" is on the rise in the African country of Cameroon. The procedure -- which involves the flattening of a young girl's growing breasts with hot stones, coconut shells and other objects -- is considered a way to curb the country's staggering number of teenage pregnancies, particularly high in rural areas, as well as limit the risk of sexual assault.

According to a new report by CurrentTV, Cameroonian mothers believe breast ironing will protect their daughters from becoming pregnant and being assaulted in that it will postpone their development and men will not be enticed by their breasts. With dietary habits in the country improving, girls are beginning to hit puberty as young as 9, and are subject to the practice around at the same age. . . . .

For the rest of the story and to view a moving video follow this link to: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/23/teenage-girls-undergo-bre_n_656965.html
Read more!

Monday, July 26, 2010

News from The Salvation Army's World Youth Conference

Dear Friends:

Here are two items that I believe you'll find of special interest. First, below you'll find a brief report on Commissioner Helen Clifton's calling on women within The Salvation to join the fight again human trafficking. It's wonderful to have such support for anti-trafficking from the highest levels of Salvation Army leadership.

Additionally, I'm providing a link to The Salvation Army's World Youth Conference where you'll find an exciting message from General Shaw Clifton about God's call to The Salvation Army. To view the video:
http://www1.salvationarmy.org/ihq/www_wyc.nsf

Select - Day 4 (red tabs)
-Final Meeting (you have to scroll down)
-Chapter: General Shaw Clifton (select from the arrow part)
Advance to 1:44:00 to hear about The Army's commissioning
2:04:00 be Cross conscience people
2:05:00 be dedicated to the unexpected
2:05:45 to hear about TSA being raised up by God
2:07:00 He will find somebody else
2:10:18 be Advocates for Justice/Sanctified Risks/War Against Sin & Hell!!!

Abolition!

Lisa

*************************************

http://www.crosswalk.com/news/religiontoday/11635254/

Young Salvationists Hear Call to Tackle Human Trafficking

Christian Today reports that The Salvation Army is calling on women within its ranks to join the fight against human trafficking. Commissioner Helen Clifton delivered a "wake up call" to the youths at The Salvation Army's World Youth Convention in Stockholm, Sweden, on Saturday. "We need to be wiser and better trained, but without losing the deep passion for those who have lost their innocence and succumbed to what is a sad and lonely life," said Clifton. "The work involves prevention, prosecution, protection and prayer." Clifton spoke to about 1,000 young women at the event. Commissioner Christine MacMillan, the director of The Salvation Army's International Social Justice Commission (ISJC), addressed the convention via DVD. "Our journey of faith needs to be disturbed by all these injustices in the world. If it isn't then our hearts are either numb or hardened and we need God to renew our sensitivity," she said.
Read more!

Friday, July 23, 2010

UK/India: Unilever's hypocrisy over skin-lightening

Dear Friends:

First, a thank you to author Melinda Tankard Reist (Getting Real: Challenging the Sexualization of Girls) for alerting me to the article below. In follow up to yesterday's posting about Dove's "Real Beauty Campaign" this important article provides a larger, and sadly more honest perspective of what Dove's parent brand, Unilever, is up to. That agenda is apparently the "whitening" of humanity -- for profit of course.

Also please follow the important discussion about Unilever's Lynx/Axe brand. It would appear Unilever is of two minds on the matter of women/girls/beauty. Be advised: talk to your daughter before Unilever does!

Abolition!

Lisa

By: Layla Sayeed
guardian.co.uk, Friday 16 July 2010 10.00 BST
Stand up to Unilever's hypocrisy over skin-lightening


Unilever's backing of whiter beauty in India while its Dove brand urges self-esteem makes me ashamed to work in advertising.
Vaseline's homepage asks: "Do you see your skin the way we do? Your skin is amazing."

Well, it's clearly not so amazing if you're brown. Vaseline, a sub-brand of Unilever, has just launched a Facebook app in India that allows users to whiten their profile pictures. The app, which is designed to promote Vaseline's range of skin-lightening creams for men, promises to "transform your face on Facebook with Vaseline Men" in a campaign fronted by Bollywood actor Shahid Kapur. According to Pankaj Parihar of Omnicom, the global communications group behind the campaign, "the response has been pretty phenomenal".

The fact that the response has been "phenomenal" is sad but not surprising. While it might be hard for the tanorexics among us to understand, skin lightening is a huge, and extremely lucrative, industry. According to a report by Global Industry Analysts, it is predicted to reach $10bn by 2015.

And while skin-lightening products have traditionally been targeted at women, the beauty industry is growing increasingly excited about the financial rewards to be had by drumming up a bit of self-loathing in men. It's expected that sales of male skin-lightening products could reach similar levels of value sales as their female-targeted counterparts within five to 10 years. But men aren't the only demographic on the marketeers' strategic horizons: children are also fair game. An Indian Readership Survey in 2008 found that 12 to 14-year-olds accounted for 13% of the market.

It makes for pretty sickening reading. But what makes it even more nauseating is the fact that Vaseline is a sub-brand of Unilever, which also own brands like Dove. Dove, if you remember, set about saving our little girls from the beauty industry with their Campaign for Real Beauty. The much lauded campaign included inspirational films like Onslaught, which suggested "you talk to your daughter before the beauty industry does".

Hypocrisy is nothing new with Unilever. While Dove's multimillion-pound campaigns shunned stereotypes of women, Lynx (another Unilever brand) turned stereotyping women into something of an art form. In 2007, film-maker Rye Clifton created a mashup [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwDEF-w4rJk (note this starts out like the Onslaught ad circulated yesterday- Lisa)] of Unilever's Axe (Lynx) and Dove communications, which juxtaposed the different messages the two Unilever brands were putting into the market with disturbing effect. Apologists made the excuse that Dove and Axe are very different entities with different targets, different voices and, so, different values. . . .

For the rest of the article go to:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/jul/16/unilever-hypocritical-promoting-skin-lightening
Read more!

Thursday, July 22, 2010

Texas Supreme Court Rules: Children in Prostitution are Victims, Not Criminals.

Dear Friends:

Here is some terrific news out of Texas from our friends at ECPAT. No more treating child victims of commercial sexual exploitation like criminals.

Lisa


Posted By: Carol Smolenski
To: Members in End Child Prostitution, Child Pornography and Trafficking of Children for Sexual Purposes

Texas Supreme Court Rules: Children in Prostitution are Victims, Not Criminals.

"Because a 13 year old child cannot consent to sex as a matter of law…B.W. cannot be prosecuted as a prostitute
--SupremeCourt of Texas decision "In the Matter of B.W.", June 18, 2010


Thirteen-year-old B.W. was arrested for prostitution when she flagged down the car of an undercover officer and offered to engage in oral sex for twenty dollars. She was tried in Family Court, where she admitted that she had "knowingly agreed to engage in sex…for a fee," and received a sentence of 18-months’ probation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment and the Texas Supreme Court agreed to review her case.

Although the federal government, under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, classifies sexually exploited children as victims, many states, including Texas, have contradictory laws that permit the prosecution of children for prostitution: One law establishes the age of sexual consent as 16; a different law sets no minimum age for the crime of prostitution, leaving the state prosecutor to determine which law to follow.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Texas addressed this issue head on and reversed the Court of Appeals by a 6-3 decision.
http://www.supreme.courts.state.tx.us/historical/2010/jun/081044.pdf It said that "…transforming a child victim of adult sexual exploitation into a juvenile offender was not the legislature’s intent when it enacted the laws on prostitution" and "delinquent conduct of a child." … "As a 13- year-old, B.W. cannot consent to sex as a matter of law, and therefore cannot be prosecuted as a prostitute."

The Texas decision supported several arguments that advocates of sexually exploited children have been pressing.

1. Children cannot consent to sex because they lack the maturity to understand the consequences.
Responding to the prosecutor’s argument that B.W. "pleaded true" to "knowingly engaging in sex for a fee," the Supreme Court cited longstanding common law, Texas statutes, and numerous cases affirming that children below age14 cannot understand the significance of agreeing to sex. This makes it difficult, the court said, to see how a child’s agreement could reach the ‘knowingly’ standard required by the statute. Referring to the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that juveniles "are more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures," the majority opinion held that even expert psychologists find it difficult to differentiate "between the juvenile offender whose crime reflects unfortunate yet transient immaturity and the rare juvenile offender whose crime reflects irreparable corruption." The Court further ruled that legislative intent was clear enough and did not need bolstering. Although it did not rule on children above the age of 14, the court did cite legislation saying that "compelling a child under 18 to commit prostitution was a second-degree felony."

2. Prohibiting the adjudication of children for prostitution will not encourage more exploitation.
While the State argued that judging a child innocent of a crime would also make a pimp immune from criminal liability and free him to seek out even more children, the Court held that the exploitation or prostitution of a child below the age of 14 is already a crime. "It is unclear how the prosecution of a child for prostitution would serve as any further deterrent, especially in the case of children on the streets." Removing children from arrest and prosecution will also remove the opportunity for pimps to play on their fear of police.

3. The inability to prosecute children for prostitution does not let adult offenders off the hook.
The Court rejected the State’s assumption that prohibiting the charging of juveniles for prostitution prevents prosecutors from bringing cases against adult offenders. In doing so,it identified several statutes under which pimps and traffickers can be held criminally liable for exploiting children without their being present to testify. Addressing the intent of the legislature, the Supreme Court said that children cannot be considered guilty of an act that involves their own sexual exploitation. "It is far more likely that the legislature intended to punish those who sexually exploit children rather than subject child victims below 14 years to prosecution."

The case also demonstrates how traffickers and pimps are usually the last to be arrested, while children bear the brunt of the scrutiny and punishment. As the State’s litany of B.W.’s criminal offenses (prostitution, assault, drug possession, failure to attend school, sexually transmitted diseases, and two abortions) read like a clear indictment, the prosecutors acknowledged but made no effort to even investigate her "32 year old boyfriend with whom she lived with and had sex." The Supreme Court did not address this issue.

4. Placing a child in detention does nothing to keep her safe, force her recovery, or prevent her running away.
Dismissing the argument that prohibiting the criminal prosecution of an exploited child would leave the State with no option but to put her back on the street, the Court cited many State alternatives to protect a child’s health and safety by a police officer or child protective services.

At the same time, the prosecution argument has some merit. Service providers are in desperately short supply and many children do wind up back on the street in the arms of their pimps. But the solution is to ensure services that help children to heal, not detention that may further traumatize them or mark their future.

Texas Decision Complements Safe Harbor Laws

Citing Texas state law and interpreting its intent, the Supreme Court decision shows that efforts to protect the child from prosecution are firmly grounded in legal precedent. Safe harbor laws passed in four states so far – New York, Connecticut, Washington, and Illinois – complement the court’s intent to shift the focus from criminalizing to protecting a child, and to punishing the pimps and buyers, even without a child’s cooperation. Aiming to protect and prevent any person below age 18 from being charged, prosecuted, or incarcerated for prostitution, safe harbor laws refer exploited children to special services and shelters to support their recovery, and require special training of law enforcement, judges, and first responders.

A giant step forward, the Texas decision and passage of safe harbor laws by four states is just the beginning. Much more is needed to combat the increasing demand for and exploitation of children. Across the country, media increasingly report on U.S. children being sexually exploited on the streets, over the internet, in strip clubs and brothels. All states need to follow this new precedent through the courts and legislatures to protect children from prosecution for prostitution and to ensure adequate and appropriate services for their recovery.
Read more!

Dove's Real Beauty Campaign -- The Onslaught Ad

Dear Friends:

In case you are unfamiliar with Dove's "Real Beauty Campaign" below are two links to short ads related to the campaign you should watch. I especially like the one that points out what an onslaught little girls face from the so-called "beauty industry," which works every day to teach them how "imperfect" they are. It's a big fat lie, but when it comes at you from the cradle girls find it hard not to believe.

Abolition!

Lisa







See also: http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report.aspx Read more!

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

U.S. policy a paper tiger against sex trade in war zones

By Nick Schwellenbach and Carol Leonnig
Sunday, July 18, 2010; A04

An eight-year-old policy that forbids government contractors and employees to engage in sex trafficking in war zones has proved almost impossible to enforce amid indications that such activities are occurring in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The policy, instituted eight years ago by President George W. Bush and still in effect today, calls for the prosecution of government employees and contractors who engage in trafficking and the suspension or disqualification of companies whose workers do. Bush's get-tough language also threatened criminal prosecutions for solicitation of prostitutes because many of the women are forced into the work.

Agencies say the cases are difficult to pursue because of limited investigative resources and jurisdictional questions. But some experts and lawmakers believe that authorities are turning a blind eye to evidence of such crimes.

"Zero prosecutions," said Martina Vandenberg, a lawyer and former Human Rights Watch investigator, "suggests zero effort to enforce the law."

The State Department reported recently that allegations of contractors' employees procuring commercial sex acts were "well publicized" but that no contractors have been prosecuted and no contracts terminated.

Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), author of a 2000 U.S. anti-trafficking law, questions whether agencies vigorously pursue allegations. He suggested that if authorities really cared about the women being exploited, they would not look away "when those we are paying to do jobs for us are exploiting them."

Justice Department spokesman Alejandro Miyar said the agency "investigates all credible allegations of human trafficking."

An Army report

Nearly a decade after Dyncorp International employees were accused of buying and selling women from throughout Eastern Europe -- and were not prosecuted -- the State Department alerted the U.S. Army to allegations made by a freelance journalist. The journalist said she had interviewed women held in Iraq as involuntary servants in debt slavery.

The February report, posted online as part of an Army PowerPoint presentation, alleged that supervisors of an Army subcontractor in Iraq had sexually assaulted some of the women.

"The women were recruited from their home nations with promises of well-paying beautician jobs in Dubai," said an Army summary, "but were instead forced to surrender their passports, transported against their will to Iraq, and told they could only leave by paying a termination fee of $1,100."

The subcontractors work for the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, which runs restaurants and other commercial operations on military bases.

An Army Criminal Investigation Command spokesman, who declined to discuss specifics, said the allegations "were investigated and not substantiated."

In another allegation, a former guard with the Blackwater security firm said he saw colleagues and U.S. soldiers paying Iraqi girls for sex acts. The allegations surfaced in a federal lawsuit filed last summer in the Eastern District of Virginia that alleged wrongful death and abuse on behalf of families of Iraqi victims. But the anonymous statement detailing the allegations was withdrawn by the Iraqi families, who agreed to a settlement in January.

The former guard, who asked that his name not be used out of concern for his safety, said that in 2005, he watched older boys collect dollar bills while Iraqi girls, some as young as 12 or 13, performed sex acts. The former guard said that he reported what he saw to his Blackwater superiors but that no action was taken. "It sickens me to talk about it even now," he said.

The former Blackwater guard also said he provided the information to a grand jury, but the Justice Department would not confirm or deny the existence of an investigation.

Stacy DeLuke, a spokeswoman for Blackwater, now known as Xe Services, said the firm "vehemently denies these anonymous and baseless allegations." She said Xe policies forbid human trafficking.

Brothels in Afghanistan

In Afghanistan, evidence of trafficking came to light when 90 Chinese women were freed after brothel raids in 2006 and 2007. The women told the International Organization on Migration that they had been taken to Afghanistan for sexual exploitation, according to a 2008 report.

Nigina Mamadjonova, head of IOM's counter-human trafficking unit in Afghanistan, said the women alleged in interviews that their clients were mostly Western men.

In late 2007, officials at ArmorGroup, which provides U.S. Embassy security in Kabul, learned that some employees frequented brothels that were disguised as Chinese restaurants and that the employees might be engaged in sex trafficking. A company whistleblower has alleged in an ongoing lawsuit that the firm withheld the information from the U.S. government.

James Gordon, then an ArmorGroup supervisor, alleged that a manager "boasted openly about owning prostitutes in Kabul" and that a company trainee boasted that he hoped to make some "real money" in brothels and planned to buy a woman for $20,000.

Gordon said he warned his bosses and also alerted Heidi McMichael, a State Department contracting officer.

Months later, Gordon said, he asked McMichael why no action had been taken, and she told him that the matter had been referred to the FBI. She declined to comment, as did the bureau. Gordon said that the trainee was fired but that no other action was taken.

Susan Pitcher, a spokesman for ArmorGroup's parent company, Wackenhut Services, said in an e-mail that the company would not respond to Gordon's allegations. She stressed that ArmorGroup policies prohibit trafficking.

An internal corporate investigation in November 2007 found that a Kabul program manager knew that some workers had violated company policies by "seeking out prostitutes."

The report disputed allegations that the manager frequented brothels but concluded that he knew about activities "that could bring discredit upon both the company and the client." A letter of reprimand was placed in his file.

A difficult mandate

Justice Department prosecutors privately complain that the zero-tolerance policy is nearly unenforceable -- partly because it makes little distinction between organized sexual slavery and voluntary prostitution. [Once again the government shifts responsibility from sex buyers, pimps and traffickers to instead attempting to ascertain what degree of culpability the women may have. The fact that any personnel/contractor representing or acting on behalf of the U.S. government in overseas missions are engaging in commercial sex acts is a disgrace, and is certainly a vital national security interest. Such behavior foments resentment, anger and hostility from the very citizens we are trying to help. Why? Because the local residents know that by such actions these contractors take advantage of and exploit the very women/girls they are there to help. Further the actions of these contractors fuels the impression (or is it the reality?) that the U.S. is debauched. -- Lisa]

"Are we interested in chasing every contractor that gets a hooker or using our resources to go after the guys who force people into modern-day slavery?" asks one former trafficking investigator, who requested anonymity. [This attitude lets the sex buyer (e.g. the demand generator) off the hook and focuses only on the supplier (e.g. trafficker/pimp). It also seems to me, that the attitude presumes the women are so-called voluntary prostitutes. Any trafficking investigator worth their salt knows that the vast majority of women in the sex industry have been coerced at some point, but overtime be come conditioned to their exploitation. It takes a nuanced understanding of the dynamics of power and control to discover trafficking victims. -- Lisa]

Laura Dickinson, an Arizona State University law professor, said law enforcement authorities face two main challenges in pursuing such crimes: gathering evidence and legal jurisdiction.

The FBI has 35 to 40 agents in war zones, but they are focused on investigating fraud and corruption. The military's law enforcement agencies have about 150 agents in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait handling all types of felony-level crimes.

Some experts say investigators and prosecutors will probably decline a trafficking case if it proves time-consuming and manpower-intensive.

Gordon, the former ArmorGroup manager, questioned whether agencies take the allegations seriously.

"If it's so serious," he said, "if you have a zero-tolerance policy, why aren't you doing anything?"

This report is a collaboration between the Center for Public Integrity and The Washington Post.
Read more!